Wikileaks: Viewing Cable 09ANKARA44, TURKEY’S CIRCASSIANS DEMAND FREEDOM TO TRAVEL TO ABKHAZIA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09ANKARA44 2009-01-12 14:37 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Ankara

VZCZCXRO4752

PP RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR

DE RUEHAK #0044/01 0121437

ZNY CCCCC ZZH

P 121437Z JAN 09

FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA

TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8430

INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY

RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY

RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3/J-5// PRIORITY

RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU PRIORITY

RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY

RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY

RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 000044

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/SE, EUR/CARC

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/09/2018

TAGS: PREL PGOV GG RS TU

SUBJECT: TURKEY’S CIRCASSIANS DEMAND FREEDOM TO TRAVEL TO

ABKHAZIA

REF: A. 08 ANKARA 2181

B. 08 SECSTATE 134559

C. 08 ANKARA 1635

Classified By: POL Counselor Daniel O’Grady, reasons 1.4 (b,d)

1. (C) SUMMARY.  Representatives of an estimated six million

Circassians living in Turkey are demanding the right to

travel to Abkhazia directly, potentially complicating Turkish

efforts to maintain restrictions on direct travel and adopt

further measures to isolate Abkhaz de facto authorities (refs

A and B).  Representatives of the Circassian community are

warning the government that Circassian citizens will make

their views known at the ballot box in upcoming municipal

elections if the “embargo” is not lifted.  Circassian

representatives maintain that Turkey is losing influence and

prestige in Abkhazia as a result of the travel restrictions,

driving the region further into the arms of Russia.  A

resumption of the ferry connection between Sukhumi and

Trabzon and/or a flight between Sukhumi and Istanbul would

have a big impact, according to our contacts, encouraging

further Abkhazia’s western orientation.  END SUMMARY.

2. (C) We met recently with Federation of Caucasian

Associations (KAF-FED) General Coordinator Cumhur Bal.

KAF-FED is an umbrella federation representing about 80

Circassian associations in Turkey.  Turkey, he estimates, has

a Circassian population of about six million (see ref C).

Apart from advocating measures to protect Circassian cultural

and linguistic rights, such as Circassian-language

programming on the state-owned TRT network, the Circassian

community’s highest priority, he told us, is lifting the

“embargo” on direct travel to Abkhazia.  Ensuring that Abkhaz

leaders, namely “President” Bagapsh, are not prohibited from

traveling to Turkey is another key priority.

3. (C) According to Bal, representatives of the Circassian

community are warning the government that Circassian citizens

will make their views known at the ballot box in upcoming

municipal elections if the “embargo” on direct travel to

Abkhazia is not lifted.  The government, Bal said, is denying

its citizens basic freedom of movement.  Presently, Turkish

citizens must apply for a transit visa from Russia to travel

to Abkhazia. (Previously they had been entering Russia on a

tourist visa and then traveling on to Abkhazia.)  He

questioned why Turkey, which was not party to the CIS,

implemented the CIS sanctions in 1995, terminating the

Trabzon-Sukhumi ferry and effectively proscribing direct

travel to Abkhazia, while Russia, which had been legally

bound to impose those sanctions, issued visas for Turks to

travel there.  The embargo is demeaning, said Bal, and

diminishes Turkey’s prestige and influence in Abkhazia.  A

resumption of the ferry connection between Sukhumi and

Trabzon and/or a flight between Istanbul and Sukhumi, would

have a big impact, encouraging further Abkhazia’s western

orientation, he maintained.

4. (C) Bal said he knows that GOT recognition of Abkhaz

independence is unrealistic at this stage, but insisted that

Turkey’s Circassians remain committed to it in the long-run.

Abkhazia, he argued, meets the criteria of statehood:  a

defined community, historical boundaries, functioning

institutions, and a representative government.  He recounted

dramatically the tragic, historical narrative underpinning

Abkhazia’s independence claim, emphasizing Abkhazia’s

battle-won sovereignty, and blaming President Saakashvili and

his two predecessors for “killing” the possibility of union

with Georgia.  But he did not rule out completely a future

modus vivendi with Georgia.  He posited that any Abkhaz

decision to partner with Georgia would have to be arrived at

from a position of sovereignty and that, for this to happen,

Georgia would need to become a trustworthy country.  This, he

insisted, was impossible under Saakashvili.

5. (C) Asked how Circassians in Turkey reconcile the argument

that Turkey should increase its outreach to Abkhazia in order

to diminish Russian hegemony there, while at the same time

applauding Russia’s stance in the region, Bal said he is

under no illusions about Russian intentions, knowing that

Russia will “want to play the game” with Abkhazia.  But the

Abkhaz people, he said, have been left without options.

Abkhazia’s independence is viable, he maintained, unlike

South Ossetia’s.  He said he fully expects South Ossetia to

ANKARA 00000044  002 OF 002

join the Russian Federation and does not oppose this

strongly. The division of North and South Ossetia was a

Stalinist measure that should be undone, similar to the

decision to attach the Abkhaz nation to Georgia.

COMMENT

——-

6. (C) After decades of rigid state policies (now beginning

to crack) aimed at promoting Turkish national identity,

language and culture, Circassian identity in Turkey remains

limited, despite the community’s large numbers.  There is

little evidence that Turkey’s six million Circassians,

including the 500,000 estimated to be of Abkhaz origin,

constitute a defined voting block formidable enough to alter

fundamentally GOT policy on as sensitive an issue as support

for Georgia’s territorial integrity and stability in the

Caucasus.  Indeed, above any aspirations for greater cultural

and linguistic rights, Circassians are known for their

patriotism, and, as a broadly secular and affluent community,

are not aligned with the ruling Islamist-oriented Justice and

Development Party (AKP).  However, Circassians are

increasingly making their voices heard, limiting, we believe,

Turkey’s capacity to implement additional measures, such as

travel bans (refs A and B), aimed at isolating Abkhazia’s de

facto leaders.

Visit Ankara’s Classified Web Site at

http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Turk ey

Jeffrey

http://wikileaks.org/cable/2009/01/09ANKARA44.html

Share Button