| From: | Sent: 1/17/2008 9:06 PM |
BRITAIN CALLS FSB HARASSMENT OF CULTURAL STAFF ‘UNACCEPTABLE’… Following the questioning of Russian British Council staff by the Federal Security Service (FSB) and the brief detention for alleged traffic violations of Stephen Kinnock, who heads the council’s St. Petersburg branch, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said in London on January 16 that “any intimidation or harassment of [council] officials is obviously completely unacceptable,” news agencies reported (see “RFE/RL Newsline,” 14, 15, and 16 January, 2008). He stressed that “we take that very seriously, indeed.” The council’s 29 Russian employees were reportedly subjected to multiple questionings on January 15-16 by officials of the FSB, the tax service, and the financial crimes unit of the Interior Ministry, Britain’s “Financial Times” reported on January 17. Some questionings took place in government offices, while others involved police officials visiting council employees in their homes. James Kennedy, who heads the council’s operations in Russia, said that the officials “are suggesting to our staff that they are working for an illegal organization, which we strongly contest, and that they are working as instruments of provocation for a foreign power, which again we contest.” These developments are part of an ongoing dispute over the right of the British Council to operate in Russia, which in turn is widely seen as part of the continuing row stemming from the 2006 London murder of former Russian security agent Aleksandr Litvinenko. The BBC noted on January 16 that Britain has few possibilities “for retaliation” against the Russian moves. The broadcaster added that London prefers to avoid further escalation of the dispute, but did not say what Britain might do if Russia took further moves against British staff. The broadcaster suggested that London is content “to keep the high moral ground” in the row. The BBC reported on January 17 that the council offices in St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg, which were closed when the Russian staff were summoned to the police for questioning, are likely to remain closed for the immediate future. “There seems to be little appetite at the U.K. Foreign Office for further retaliation,” the broadcaster noted. PM …WHILE RUSSIA WARNS OF ‘CONSEQUENCES’ Russian Ambassador to Britain Yury Fedotov said on Russian television on January 16 that “the British side, which initiated the worsening of our relations last summer, must now think seriously about the consequences that may follow if it does not fulfill the Russian authorities’ decision to close the British Council offices.” He did not elaborate. The daily “Nezavisimaya gazeta” wrote on January 17 that “the FSB will deal with the British Council now.” The paper suggested that the imbroglio “seems to be a blind alley. The Brits are not being particularly tactful or polite. Shown the door by the host, they obstinately refuse to leave. On the other hand, Moscow’s rigid stand on the matter reminds observers of the Soviet era, when the interests of citizens were sacrificed in the name of the state without a second thought.” The daily noted that “according to the BBC, 20,000 Russians studied at the British Council’s language courses and 500,000 learned the English language with the help from teachers trained by the British Council since 1994.” The paper added that currently “2,500 young Russians study at British colleges and universities and owe their good fortune to the British Council. Last but not the least, lots of Russians will lose jobs if the British Council offices in the regions are closed for good.” PM http://www.rferl.org/newsline/2008/01/1-rus/rus-170108.asp |

