An international conference entitled Hidden Nations

An international conference entitled Hidden Nations, Enduring Crimes: The Circassians and the Peoples of the North Caucasus Between Past and Future was held in Tbilisi on 20-21 March 2010. The conference was organized by the Jamestown Foundation and the International School of Caucasus Studies at Ilia State University.

Activists from the North Caucasian Diaspora and well-known academics, including Professor Norman Stone, Moshe Gammer and Marie Bennigsen, took part in the conference.

The participants addressed historical events as well as current developments related to the region.

At the end of the conference, the Circassian and the Chechen and Ingush delegations signed an appeal to the Parliament of Georgia and parliaments of other countries of the world asking them to recognize as genocide the actions carried out by the Russian state with regard to the North Caucasian peoples in the 19th and 20th centuries. The Circassian resolution also contains an appeal to recognize the town of Sochi as the place and a symbol of the Circassian genocide thus preventing the 2014 Winter Olympics from being held there.

http://peacetocaucasus.com/

Share Button

Russian Occupation Is The Real Enemy

Russian Occupation Is The Real Enemy

Puppet President of Kabardino – Balakaria Republic, Kanokov himself is a Russian agent, and particularly an agent to the FSB and the associate underground federal services gangsters.

 

The way Kaderov, the father was. He was the Mufti (undercover) of “independent Chechnya” who worked for Russian FSB, and he had eventually had to appear in the public eye, after he was for long an undercover agent and spy, but only when the Russians needed him to be the head of the puppet government that is designated by the Russian imperial authorities, which made Kaderov Junior to follow his father’s foot-steps and thoughts.

 

All the crimes carried out by the Kaderovists in Chechnya, Ingushetia, KBR, Moscow and even in the European capitals, are well known and even done in coordination with (the master-minds) those who facilitated and organized the murder and assassination, and who got connections with those who created the problems and still, within the same peoples and nations, to create effects according to “divide and conquer”!

 

Even if Kanokov and his gangsters know that the Russians would not appreciate or support what they usually do and they have already done, they wouldn’t dare to do.  

 

In criminal investigations to know the real criminal, it goes by finding out who is benefiting from the crime to know who committed the crime.

 

Even if Kanokov and his gangsters have no other way but to admit their guilt, they wouldn’t dare to say who is behind them.

 

Look at the so-called elections of the CIA, that appeared as a circus, and it was obvious that Kanokov and his gangsters had carried out and accomplished their mission and the conspiracy of doing all what they could to implement the Russian government’s policy and agenda. Also they made their best to marginalize the Circassian youth movement during the eighth conference in Maykop, during the month of October, because its agenda was of a Circassian national one.

 

That is why Russia had worked to get the CIA headquarters imprisoned and isolated in Nalchik, in order to dictate what is good for Russia that harms Circassians and their national identity.

 

I am sure that due to the fact that 10% of Circassians are living in Motherland under the rule of the Russian colonial and imperial authorities, they have to deal with them as the local authorities that implement their so-called “rule of law”, but in the back of Circassians’ minds and with wider scope and horizons, they have to have the real vision, and the detailed picture. 

 

Circassians should not be naive, and they have to pinpoint the real issues that need to be dealt with!

 

What is going on at present time in Motherland between Circassians from one side and Balkar and Karachay on the other one is not in any way a problem between these ethnic groups but a Russian policy to make gaps and even cracks in the historical and solid links and connections between them?

 

Circassians, Balkar and Karachay had defended their common interests together against the Russian invasion and later on occupation, who had personal relations between individuals and families, which no one can deny or ignore, and all of these ethnicities and others were victims of Russian genocide, and they had to be together at the Russian deportation lists!

 

Look at all of those Diaspora deportees! Who are they? Where they came from? What they are up to?

 

Simple answers for those questions: They are victims of Russian crimes and genocide, they all came from the country of Circassia in particular and the North Caucasus in general, and they are disseminating in the global community away from Motherland, but there is an awareness that all of those ethnicities to work together for restoring freedom of self-determination and independence in accordance with the international law and the United Nations Charter and regulations of Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

 

The same evil power that is behind what has happened in Nalchik on the 30th of November, is the same associated devil that cultivates incitement and division among the Circassians and their fellow citizens, and logic states that misunderstanding and variation should not be developed like a snow-ball, but on the contrary, the wise and intellectual people should have wider horizons to look into the problems created by the occupation because conflicts will make everyone gets a share of loss “God forbid”.

 

The enemy and the main problem for all is the Russian occupation.

 

Those victims who were targeted to terrorize Circassians through this cowardly act are the Circassian heroes of the 21st Century, and “One crowded hour of glorious life is worth an age without a name”.

 

“None are so blind or so deaf, as those who will not see or hear”.

 

Work with the Russian occupiers is the root of all evils and disasters.

 

Unity is strength, and truth will prevail.

 

Eagle

1st of December, 2009

 

Justice For North Caucasus Group

Share Button

What Happened to Anna Politkovskaya

What Happened to Anna Politkovskaya

At time of these tragic days hundreds of our colleagues, state officials and readers expressed their concern about the fate of our observer Anna Politkovskaya. They believed that her presence at Beslan could have proved useful. However, Politkovskaya did not reach Beslan.
In the evening on September 1 Politkovskaya went to Vnukovo Airport in the Novaya Gazeta editor’s car. She had contacted a number of Russian politicians and the representative of Maskhadov in London Ahmed Zakaev. Her proposals boiled down to the following: anyone who can contact terrorists should immediately go without calculating the [political] consequences in order to rescue the children. “Let Maskhadov go and negotiate with them “. Zakaev noted that Maskhadov was ready to negotiate without any conditions or guarantees.
Flights to Vladikavkaz as well as to the nearest cities were cancelled from Vnukovo Airport. Three times Politkovskaya was registered and three times could not depart. Editors issued the following order: fly to Rostov and from there get to Beslan by car. Airline “Carat” takes Anna on board.
Important detail: all day long Politkovskaya had not time to have a meal. She refused (as she is person of experience) a meal on the plane, taking porridge with her. She felt fine and only requested tea from the stewardess. Anna lost consciousness 10 minutes after drinking and had enough time to call the stewardess.
Further she remembers only fragments. Doctors took fantastic efforts at the first aid office at Rostov airport. They tried and managed to bring her out of a coma. This was attributable to the precise work of the doctors in the isolation ward of the first Rostov hospital. In miserable conditions they reanimated Anna improvising in all possible manner – even using plastic bottles with hot water. A dropper, injections, – she regained her consciousness by the morning.
Grigory Yavlinsky, our colleagues from “Izvestiya” (staff reporter Vladimir But) and general Solodovnikov did everything in their power to resolve a problem that doctors termed “almost hopeless”. The doctors coped with the task.
In the evening on September 3, with the help of our friends (thanks to our bankers!) we forwarded Anna by private plane to one of the Moscow clinics. Rostov doctors gathered to see her off. The Rostov laboratory analysis is not ready yet. The first analyses taken in the airport were destroyed for some reason. The Moscow doctors directly declared: the actual toxin remains unclear, but entered her organism from the outside, in the plane.
We do not want to make any statements before we learn all the circumstances. However, the situation with the journalist of “Liberty” Babitsky who was removed from a flight to Northern Caucasus on the suspicion of transporting an explosive (naturally, it was not found), and the case with Politkovskaya leads us to assume that an attempt was made to debar a number of journalists who are authoritative in Chechnya from covering the tragedy in Beslan.
Now Politkovskaya is at home under supervision of doctors. In their opinion, she has seriously affected kidneys, livers and endocrine system owing to the unknown toxin. Unfortunately it remains unclear how much time will be required for her rehabilitation…
Why were officials so anxious about Politkovskaya’s activity and not focus instead on their own work? And prevent, for example, terrorist acts?

Share Button

ANTARA News: Russia, Islamic World Dialog Expected To Form Strategic Alliance!

From: Eagle_wng

Apr 01 23:02
Russia, Islamic world dialog expected to form strategic alliance
 
by Erafzon S.A.S.
Moscow (ANTARA News) – Russia, formerly part of the dissolved superpower Soviet Union, has drawn international attention by hosting a dialog on “Strategic Vision, Russia – The Islamic World” here on March 27-28, 2006.

Present in the dialog were 17 Islamic leaders from Muslims populated countries and a representative of Rabithah Al Islami. The meeting was organized by a Russian NGO, but in fact the organizer was a former government official in this state.

The meeting presided over by Evgeny Maksimovich Primakov, former Russian Prime Minister during Boris Yeltsin leadership. At the opening of the meeting, Primakov read out a written message of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The Russian Head of Government revealed in his message that the Russian foreign policy gives priority to the dialog with the Islamic world. He explained that Russia has a long history of the Islamic world, relating to the aspects of economy, security, science/technology and culture.

Islam entered Russia in the seventh century and then developed in the Russian peninsula. Bukhara, the birthplace of renowned Islamic leader Imam Bukhari, used to be part the dissolved Soviet Union. Islam has shown the rapidest growth in Russia, about 15 percent of the Russian population consists of Muslims today.

It seems that Putin is desirous of retrieving good relations with the Islamic world, or probably wants to use the relationship with the Islamic world as a vehicle to get back the Russian position as a superpower.

When asked by the press about the political and economic benefit Russia expects to obtain by embracing the Islamic world, Primakov said diplomatically Russia does not think of advantage or disadvantage in organizing the meeting but just hopes for the creation of justice and equality between nations, especially in the Islamic world.

Whatever arguments Primakov has made, the initiative of holding a meeting which was attended by the 17 Muslim leaders including Ayatullah Taskhiry from Iran, Prince Ghazi of Jordan and Din Syamsuddin (chairman of the Indonesian Islamic organization Muhammadiyah), has given an impression that Russia wants to take advantage of its relations with the Islamic world.

Indonesian Ambassador to Russia Susanto Pudjomartono said Russia is using the Islamic card in its foreign policy for various purposes, including breaking US foreign policy`s domination.

Susanto shared the same view with Din Stamsuddin that influencing each other or embracing other countries to consolidate power for the sake of the common interests is normal in the foreign policy of a state. In the country, Susanto said, the Russian Government has approached Islamic groups. There are a quite large number of Islamic groups in Russia, and Islam is the second biggest religion after Orthodox Christianity in this country.

Last year, the Russian Government celebrated Hijriah Islamic New Year, indicating a progress in Russian relations with the Islamic world. However, there were reports of small incidents that still occurred like an assault on a mosque by an extremist group in Russia.

Building new power

Like Ambassador Susanto, Muhammadiyah Chairman Din Syamsuddin is of the view that seeking friends by influencing each other is common in the foreign policy of a country.

“It is nothing out of the common to see a power seeking to form an alliance with others to face another strong power,” said Syamsuddin. He believed that Russia, which was formerly part of dissolved superpower Soviet Union, still has the leftover potential.

Russia now has big foreign exchange reserves with the soaring crude oil price on the world market. This country fulfills 25 percent of the demand for energy in Europe. India and China have also relied on Russia for their energy supply. This state has also got large income from the sale of armaments.

The Russian Government has offered a US$1 billion credit to Indonesia to be disbursed in stages. This year Russia will deliver US$200 million to Indonesia for the purchase of Russian-made Sukhoi jet fighters.

The Islamic world`s power is worthy of consideration, according to Syamsuddin. He pointed out that there are some 1.3 billion Muslims in the world, with human resources quality and ethical standards contained in the Islamic values. The Islamic world is rich in natural resources like petroleum and other mining products, he said.

Din emphasized that it is time to end United States domination, even more so with US trans-global policy on the eradication of global terrorism by using terrorist ways.

The chairman of the Indonesian Ulemas Council (MUI) further said the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, the threat to Iran and Syria, and the double standard practiced by the US and its alliance have made the Islamic world restless. “It is necessary, therefore, to form a power to counterbalance US hegemony,” he revealed.

Concerning the Indonesian position, Din said Indonesia surely deserves to become a strategic partner to build the new power as Indonesia is the world`s most-populous Moslem majority country today.

Joint communique

As one of the victims of terrorist attacks, Indonesia, like Russia and the Islamic world, is against terrorism. Therefore, the Russia – Islamic World dialog here on March 27-28, 2006 resulted in a joint statement on the development of cooperation in the fields of economy, culture, science/technology and security as well as the eradication of terrorism, according to Din.

He emphasized the need to take concrete corrective measures against the existing accumulative problems currently threatening the world like poverty, ignorance and backwardness. Efforts to get rid of those problems should not be merely rhetorical, he said.

One of the important measures that must be taken is, according to Din, creating a peaceful, fair, civilized and balanced world as contained in the Joint Statement issued at the end of the Russia” Islamic world dialog.

Learning from experience in connection with the occupation of Afghanistan by the Soviet Union in the past, the US used the Islamic issue to oppose Soviet occupation of that Central Asian country.

After a terrorist attack on the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001, the US occupied Iraq and supported the Afghan Government at that time, and now Russia is approaching the Islamic world to show its role. Thus, it is not clear, who makes use of who, and where the Islamic world should be.

Irrespective of all those matters, may the idea of fostering a relationship through the Russia – Islamic world dialog be fulfilled. (*)

Share Button

ANNA POLITKOVSKAYA, JOURNALIST

ANNA POLITKOVSKAYA
JOURNALIST, NOVAYA GAZETA :
I have a lot of links with Maskhadov’s people. My point of view was Maskhadov needed to go to these bandits and say to them openly, please don’t do it. Please free all the kids. After midday until evening, of course, I discussed all these details about maybe Maskhadov’s future departure to Beslan. In absolutely the open air of mobile phones.

WARK:
What happened to you when you got on the plane to Rostov?

POLITKOVSKAYA:
One boy, I didn’t know him, gave me this cup of tea. I drank it and after ten minutes, I began to feel very, very bad. After that I heard only two, three words. The crew beat me on the face and asked me, cried to me, “Please don’t die. Don’t die.” After that I discovered myself in the hospital.

WARK:
Did anyone say to you that you had been poisoned?

POLITKOVSKAYA :
Doctors said God bless you, and you are with us. You were poisoned.

WARK:
You talk about an information vacuum at Beslan, what exactly do you mean?

POLITKOVSKAYA:
Our TV channel gave society only official information. And people, relatives of hostages were out of this information. They were in a vacuum. They didn’t know what happened. What would happen in the next minutes, in the next hours.

WARK:
Is this the Kremlin pressuring the media, or do you think the media are guilty of self-censorship?

POLITKOVSKAYA:
My colleagues tried to be only in the way of the official information. It was real self-censorship, but it’s only from one hand. In the other hand, the staff administration of the President pushed a lot, during these two days, the hands of mass media.

WARK:
Do you think the West simply accepts President Putin’s policies without criticism?

POLITKOVSKAYA:
Putin is very influenced by the Western opinion. He doesn’t like to think about society and civil society in Russia, about points of view of civil society here. So, it means that only the West now could change him, could change him from tyranny to democracy.

Share Button

Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom

Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom

 

She has been poisoned by men she suspects worked for Russia’s secret service and held in a pit in Chechnya for three days by men she knows for certain worked for the successor of the KGB.

But Anna Politkovskaya, Russia’s most famous investigative journalist and the most outspoken member of the country’s increasingly enfeebled media establishment, has not buckled under the pressure.

Yesterday her most searing critique of the Russian government to date, a book entitled Putin’s Russia, was published in the UK. Its contents are likely to send the Kremlin’s spin doctors into paroxysms of anger for she paints her main subject, President Vladimir Putin, in a devastating light.

Deploying her legendary blunt prose to great effect, she savages the man she calls “a KGB snoop,” and warns that he is moving the country back to a Soviet-style dictatorship. She also does what Moscow has so far miserably failed to achieve: present a roadmap for peace in Chechnya.

At a time when the Russian media is falling over itself to fawn over Mr Putin and sustain a Soviet-style cult of personality around him, her work provides a lone dissenting voice and a voice that cannot be heard in Russia – at least outside the pages of her liberal newspaperNovaya Gazeta.

Politkovskaya does what few other Russian commentators dare and steps over an invisible line, mocking Mr Putin in an intensely personal way; comparing him to Soviet leader Josef Stalin, to a pathetic literary creation of Nikolay Gogol’s and to a bland, over-promoted spy who should never have been elevated to the dizzy Kremlin heights. She paints a relentlessly bleak view of the state of Russia today chastising those in the West whom she says the status quo “suits” and, depressingly, holds out little or no hope for improvement.

In a frank interview with The Independent yesterday she said she was fearful for the future of a country she loved, and hoped against the odds that a viable form of democracy might take hold one day.

“Under President Putin we won’t be able to forge democracy in Russia and will only turn back to the past. I am not an optimist in this regard and so my book is pessimistic. I have no hope left in my soul. Only a change of leadership would allow me to have hope but it’s a political winter. The Kremlin is turning the country back to its Soviet past.”

Admitting that her book is staunchly anti-Putin, she claims that the Russian leader rues the day in 1991 when the Soviet Union collapsed and is in the process of rebuilding his own version of the USSR which has already started to seriously impinge upon people’s basic freedoms.

“My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again,” she said. “In an Empire there are only cogs.”

 

Describing how Mr Putin has been careful to sideline any viable opponents, she argues, however, that Russia’s liberals, thrashed at the ballot box and discredited in the eyes of many Russians, are still a force to be reckoned with. “There are many people in Russia who would be strong leaders,” she said. “You might think they have their faults but nothing could be worse than Putin.”

Aligning herself strongly with the country’s liberal forces, she argues that Russia cannot leave Mr Putin at the helm until 2008 and says that fresh elections need to be held before then.

“Because Putin, a product of the country’s murkiest intelligence service, has failed to transcend his origins and stop behaving like a lieutenant-colonel in the KGB. He is still busy sorting out his freedom-loving fellow countrymen; he persists in crushing liberty just as he did earlier in his career.”

“We no longer want to be slaves, even if that is what best suits the West. We demand our right to be free.” Poking fun at Mr Putin, she compares him to the humble Tsarist clerk, Akaky Akakievich, a famous literary creation of Russian author Nikolay Gogol. The wretched Akakievich believed the key to being successful and popular lay with his expensive overcoat. He was concerned only with his own image but when the overcoat was stolen he discovered that his own soul was empty. Politkovskaya told The Independent: “Putin is like Gogol’s Akaky Akakievich. He is a small grey person who really wants not to be grey. Putin had a historic chance to be great and not to be grey but he is still grey.”

More dangerously she is convinced that Mr Putin has only contempt for ordinary Russians and democracy. “During the presidential pre-election campaign (this year) he behaved exactly like Stalin. He destroyed the democratic opposition, pulled the wool over people’s eyes, refused to even debate and constantly lied about Chechnya and about social reforms. They say we have a happy country but we do not. It is a poor country. Putin doesn’t respect people and repression will follow just as it did with Stalin.”

Elaborating on a personally harrowing experience earlier this year she describes how men she suspects were Russian secret service agents prevented her from getting to Beslan on 1 September where pro-Chechen extremists were holding some 1,200 hostages in a school. Politkovskaya had played a role in negotiations with Chechen rebels in 2002 during an ultimately tragic hostage situation in a Moscow theatre and felt her neutral status could come in handy once again.

On 1 September she phoned her rebel contacts and pleaded with them to allow Aslan Maskhadov, former Chechen president and rebel leader, to journey to Beslan and persuade the hostage-takers to release their captives. Having agreed to fly to Beslan and negotiate a safe passage for Maskhadov she set off for the airport. “My last contact with Maskhadov’s people was ten minutes before I got on the plane. I suppose I did more than a journalist normally does. I then got on the plane and drank some tea and then … nothing.”

Politkovskaya had been poisoned, she said: “I don’t remember anything else. I don’t know but can surmise what happened. ‘They’ had decided that I needed to ‘be dealt with’ though not killed. A decision was taken and a middle-ranking (FSB) officer fulfilled it.”

 

The veteran reporter’s voice tightened when asked how she felt the authorities handled the Beslan siege in which 344 people, over half of them children, died. “I didn’t see what happened because I was unconscious but I believe the presidential administration, which was pulling all the strings, was cowardly.

“One and a half days passed and nobody went to negotiate with the bandits because the presidential administration opposed such a move. It was a tragedy.”

Politkovskaya has had some unpleasant tangles with the authorities in the past. In 2000 her life was threatened by a Russian police officer because she had spoken out about an individual being kidnapped; she was forced into hiding.

In February 2001 there was worse to come. Accused of being a spy for Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev, the man who claims he masterminded Beslan, she was held in a pit for three days by the FSB without food or water.

Chechnya and its complex vortex of hatred and violence have fascinated Politkovskaya since 1999 when she first started reporting from the breakaway region. She has been back countless times since documenting in minute detail the terrible suffering of ordinary Chechens and the state of the demoralised, brutalised Russian forces. She said yesterday she took no sides in the conflict and had no truck with the likes of Basayev whatever the Kremlin may or may not think.

“He (Basayev) asked me to come and interview him once but I refused. After Budennovsk (in 1995 when Chechen rebels took 1,600 people hostage in a hospital in southern Russia) I thought there was nothing to talk about. There are no heroes and no angels in Chechnya. The war there has been going on for so long that there are only people who are interested in continuing it … And then there are the people, stuck in the middle.”

After Beslan, Politkovskaya says she wrote a letter to Mr Putin with her ideas for a peaceful settlement of the Chechen problem, urging the Kremlin to turn its back on Ramzan Kadyrov, Chechnya’s Moscow-backed deputy prime minister.

Politkovskaya’s peace plan involved demilitarisation, international peacekeepers, a crack-down on corruption and the creation of a federal commission to govern the region. “It would be made up of non governmental organisations and civil society groups who have worked in Chechnya through the two wars and who are trusted. Of course I didn’t get a response to my letter.” Politkovskaya concedes she is afraid, but has no intention of shutting up. “Of course I’m afraid (of speaking out). Everyone is afraid in the current situation. I would be delighted if the Kremlin reacted to my book. It would mean that someone had got through to them but I think there will only be a deafening silence.”

The book is not published in Russia.

 

‘WHY I DISLIKE PUTIN’

The return of the Soviet system with the consolidation of Putin’s power is obvious.

It has to be said that this has not only been made possible by our own negligence, apathy and weariness after too much revolutionary change. It has happened to choruses of encouragement from the West, primarily from Silvio Berlusconi, who appears to have fallen in love with Putin. He is Putin’s main European champion, but Putin also enjoys the support of Blair, Schröder and Chirac, and receives no discouragement from the transatlantic junior Bush.

So nothing stood in the way of our KGB man’s return to the Kremlin, neither the West nor any serious opposition within Russia. Throughout the so-called election campaign, from 7 December 2003 until 14 March 2004, Putin openly derided the electorate.

The main token of his contempt was his refusal to debate anything with anyone. He declined to expand on a single point of his own policies in the last four years. His contempt extended not only to representatives of the opposition parties but to the very concept of an opposition. He made no promises about future policy and disdained campaigning of any kind. Instead, as under the Soviet regime, he was shown on television every day, receiving top-ranking officials in his Kremlin office and dispensing his highly competent advice on how to conduct whichever ministry or department they came from.

There was, of course, a certain amount of tittering among members of the public: he was behaving just like Stalin. Putin too was simultaneously “the friend of all children” and “the nation’s first pig-farmer”, “the best miner”, the “comrade of all athletes” and the “leading film-maker”…

Why do I so dislike Putin? Because the years are passing. This summer it will be five since the second Chechen war was instigated. It shows no sign of ending. At that time the babies who were to be declared shaheeds [martyrs] were yet unborn, but all the murders of children since 1999 in bombardments and purges remain unsolved, uninvestigated by the institutions of law and order. The infanticides have never had to stand where they belong, in the dock; Putin, that great “friend of all children”, has never demanded that they should. The army continues to rampage in Chechnya as it was allowed to at the beginning of the war, as if its operations were being conducted on a training ground empty of people.

This massacre of the innocents did not raise a storm in Russia. Not one television station broadcast images of the five little Chechens who had been slaughtered. The Minister of Defence did not resign. He is a personal friend of Putin and is even seen as a possible successor in 2008. The head of the air force was not sacked. The commander-in-chief himself made no speech of condolence. Around us, it was business as usual in the rest of the world…

Why do I so dislike Putin? This is precisely why. I dislike him for a matter-of-factness worse than felony, for his cynicism, for his racism, for his lies, for the gas he used in the Nord-Ost siege, for the massacre of the innocents which went on throughout his first term as President.

“Putin’s Russia” by Anna Politkovskaya (The Harvill Press, Random House), £8.99, supported by English Pen

Share Button

Anna Politkovskaya

Anna Politkovskaya, special
correspondent for the Russian twice-weekly newspaper Novaya Gazeta, published in Moscow She received her Diploma in Journalism
from Moscow State University
in 1980, and has since worked on a number of newspapers as a correspondent and
editor.  She has a particular interest in Chechnya, and has written extensively on the
subject, including the book A Dirty War: A
Russian Reporter in Chechnya
(Harvill, 2001).  She acted as a mediator in the Nord-Ost
theatre siege in Moscow
in 2002, and has been the recipient of numerous international honors,
including:  

  • First Prize of the Lettre Ulysses
    Award (2003)
  • Hermann-Kesten Medal, PEN Germany
    (2003)
  • Courage in Journalism Award from
    the International Women’s Media Foundation (2002)
  • Most Courageous Defence of Free
    Expression from Index on Censorship (2002)
  • Special Award of Amnesty
    International (2001)
Share Button